Q CHOOSE YOUR CASE: So far in the course, you have studied many of the principles, theories, and applications of ethics. Now you will apply what you have learned to one of two case analyses. You will choose between the case of Dax Cowart and the case of Terri Schiavo. Review the description for both so as to choose the one that most interests you. To analyze your chosen case, you will use scholarly resources and the knowledge you’ve gained from the course so far to support your work. Your case analysis should be 5 pages in length (not counting title page). It will include the following: • A title page with the title of the case, your name, and date • Double-spaced, Times New Roman 12-point font • APA formatted inline citations as appropriate • A bibliography of references used ________________________________________ CASE 1: The Case of Dax Cowart Introduction I would like to introduce you to the story of Dax Cowart. Attached is an excerpt from a speech that Dax Cowart made several years ago, a speech that remains poignant for contemporary reflection. The story is heart breaking and challenges all the bounds of ethics and health care. As you listen to Dax, or read the transcript of his talk, think about the issues Dax discusses, especially in connection with capacity and the right to decline medical treatment. These are the stories and circumstances where ethics and health care collide and individuals are forced to make tough decisions. In thinking over your responses to the discussion questions, consider the concepts we have talked about in the modules to this point, such as personal moral values; bioethical principles; the need to weigh and prioritize competing moral interests; a healthcare professionals charge to provide ethical care and a patient’s right to self-determination. Instructions You will analyze Dax Cowart’s case by considering the following questions: • You are Dax’s physician. How would you respond to Dax’s requests that you “let him die”? • Would you continue to treat him against his wishes? Why or Why Not? After reviewing the case study, respond to the following questions : 1. Describe the most relevant ethical dilemma(s) presented (no more than two). 2. Identify the most relevant stakeholder(s) (no more than 3) and briefly describe the situation from their perspective. 3. Analyze the dilemma, using scholarly discussion, from the perspective of the primary stakeholder (typically the patient). Include a discussion of at least two ethical theories or bioethics principles studied in the course that relate to the dilemma and issues you identified. Include any relevant legal concerns or requirements outlined in the readings. 4. Present your assessment, resolution or potential solutions for resolving the issue. Remember that there are no right answers, per se, so reflective questions can be as appropriate as a firm conclusion. 5. Identify how this case might cause moral distress for members of the healthcare team. 6. Reviewing another contemporary case of the patient refusing forced feedings. Judge: Severely anorexic patient can refuse forced feedingsLinks to an external site.. Identify contemporary policies, standards and laws that have been put in place to prevent similar dilemmas. 7. Briefly explain what you have learned from examining this case. Dax Cowart SpeechLinks to an external site. ________________________________________ Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc.). Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. This assignment uses Turnitin. Evaluation This assignment will be graded using the HSC 312 Case Study RubricDownload HSC 312 Case Study Rubric located on the Rubrics page within the Course Introduction module of the course. Please review the rubric prior to beginning your work so that you ensure your submission meets the criteria in place for this assignment. This is one of three written assignments, which are combined worth 55% of your final course grade.